Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Talk with other Shiloh Sharps shooters.

Moderators: Kirk, Lucinda

DBREEDEN
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:25 pm

Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by DBREEDEN »

Hi I’m looking into buying a Shiloh Sharps Quigley Rifle. I’m very new to the BPCR world and I know that I will have to get into reloading but I’m having a hard time determining wether to get the gun in 45-70 or 45-110. I plan on shooting my rifle for fun maybe in the future for competition. I like the concept of having a 45-110 but does the practicality of the 45-70 outweigh the 45-110 and finding 45-110 casings seems to be extremely hard for me. Just need input from people that have this rifles and understand the pros and cons of both
Thank you
-Dalton
rdnck
Posts: 1885
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 9:33 pm
Location: Woodlawn,Texas

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by rdnck »

No brainer. Get the 45-70. Yes, I have both calibers, and have hunted and shot matches with both for years. Shoot straight, rdnck.
Chairman, Phd
Caddo Lake Chapter
FES
Charter Member FBASS

Charter Member OGANT
Randy Bohannon
Posts: 354
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:00 pm
Location: Buffalo WY

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by Randy Bohannon »

45-70 is a top choice for ease of getting them to shoot well , paper patch bullet makes it a 45-70 ++ 80 grs no problem. The 45-70 is such a friendly cartridge with no problems for parts.
User avatar
J.B.
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by J.B. »

I dont believe a year goes by without a similar question being put forward . There are a host of variables to consider...but some of these are less apparent until one actually starts shooting these rifles. If you're totally sold on having a Quigley spec rifle ...then your decision is down to calibre and whether perhaps you spec b & c case hardening or standard. Certainly the brass availability is a question and I would opt for Norma 2.9" basic or Jamison if you can locate either. I believe the Norma brass is still in production ..but availability apparently down.. possibly due to the pandemic slowing down deliveries across the globe ? Some have located Norma 3.25" and trimming it back but research that option also. If you're using only the 'holy black'... then its not an issue but if you plan...or even think you may dabble in smokeless loading.. then I'd go with 45/70. Shiloh warn against loading the big cases down with smokeless and a mistake can be costly in more ways than one. Been there.. done that. Back in the early 90's I wanted a Quigley but after some to and fro ( by mail in those days can you believe ) with the staff at Shiloh, decided on a 45/110, No. 1 Sporter, 34" bbl. The rifle was a tack driver ( I hadnt really developed my flinch yet ) and a work of art. The longer cartridge is impressive to look at and delivers some impressive performance but given the multitude of mould designs now available.. plus the option to paper patch if you go that route, the performance gap can be narrowed. If you are sold on the Quigley, then its likely you won't be happy with any deviation.. and if you vary the stock for instance ..then its not a Quigley...but it can then be chambered in a couple of gap filling cartridges..namely 45 x 2.4 ..or 45 x 2.6. They are still fire breathers when they need to be but I believe Starline have brass for both. I loved my 45 x 2 7/8"...and I'd buy it back in a heartbeat if it came up for sale at a reasonable price...but that won't happen down here. Depending on wood, it will likely weigh in just shy or close to 13 lbs. You'll be happy for the weight in either calibre but it will pay dividends with the longer cartridge. Just a few thoughts.. and worth what you paid. Get what floats your boat.

J.B.
"an experimental weapon..with experimental ammunition ? ...Lets experiment "
bobw
Posts: 3858
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:52 pm

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by bobw »

The pertinent points been made and well. If the military rifle butt fits you well and you don't do to much shooting in any one day you might tolerate the 45 2 7/8 recoil. I think you would be miles ahead to buy it in 45-70 if you plan much shooting. My 110 has a shotgun butt that helps reduce felt recoil. Bobw
bobw
Kurt
Posts: 8428
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:28 pm
Location: Not Far enough NW in Illinois

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by Kurt »

Personally I would go with the 2.4 (.45-90) You can load it with very good preference as a .45-70 or up to the low end of the 2.6 (.45-100) The 2.4 will do well for close range plinking or the 1000 yard matches without a problem. And if the fire is still lit after you had it for a while you can run a reamer in and extend it to the 110. I have .45-70's and I really don't have much use for them and they just get re oiled and sitting in the safe. But if your wanting to use smokeless than the .45-70.
The reason a dog has so many friends is because he wags his tail instead of his tongue.

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery"Winston Churchill
User avatar
Don McDowell
Posts: 7644
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:04 pm
Location: Ft. Laramie Wy
Contact:

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by Don McDowell »

I would shy away from the Quigley configuration in 110 for anything other than the occasional go out and shoot a dozen rounds. That cartridge is best used in a pistol gripped and shotgun butt gun.
AKA Donny Ray Rockslinger :?
SSShooter
Posts: 2920
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:06 am
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by SSShooter »

One nice thing about the 45-70 is that if you find it does not have enough recoil for you with that punishing military stock configuration when shooting prone you can always have it re-chambered to 45-90,-100, -110 or even -120. As has been mentioned, that stock becomes much less "good looking" once you've shot a match prone (either BPTR or BPCR). Especially with any of the 45cal cartridges.

Parts for loading the 45-70 & 45-90 are readily available. Look at Starline for brass and Buffalo Arms & Brooks for molds. There are others, but these folks are easy to find and very well regarded in the sport.
Glenn
Longknife76
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2019 4:15 pm

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by Longknife76 »

If it ain't 45 2 7/8,,,,,,,it aint a QUIGLEY!!!!!! Jus sayn''''' :lol:
ChrisF
Posts: 1151
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by ChrisF »

Yup
User avatar
powderburner
Posts: 2990
Joined: Sat May 24, 2003 12:23 am
Location: elko nv.

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by powderburner »

Ask yourself. Do i want a quigley or do i want to compete.
If you dont compete 20-40 rounds of brass will last a lifetime.
If you want to be a competitor, get you a competition rifle
The are Two different disciplines.
You can do both with either but you wont excel with either
If you want to shoot a lot prone the rifle will not be fun. If you set with cross sticks the military stock is quite comfortable if you hang on to it.
It comes down to what you want and will be happy owning.
Dean Becker
only one gun and they are 74 s
3rd asst. flunky,high desert chapter F.E.S.
MYWEIGH scale merchant
reclining member of O-G-A-N-T
Dennis Armistead
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2015 5:09 pm
Location: Payson Arizona
Contact:

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by Dennis Armistead »

If your heart is set on a Quigley then the .45 2 7/8" is the way to go. However...the .45 2.1" will be cheaper to shoot all the way around from cases to powder. The military stock does no lend itself to being a very comfortable platform when shooting prone such as in a formal competition. But...as so many of us has found out, you'll buy more than one rifle any way :D so get the rifle that you really want.
Dennis
Experience trumps intelligence every time.
jackrabbit
Posts: 1792
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:04 pm
Location: Carpenter Wyoming

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by jackrabbit »

Do you want a gun to show off and impress all your buddies, or do you want one to actually use to go to matches, hunt with, shoot lots and have fun with? If it's the former, order the Quigley in 45-110, if it's the latter, order a long range express or rough rider in 45-70 or 45-90.
The truth, Cody
Clarence
Posts: 2172
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 7:38 pm
Location: Hill Country, TX

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by Clarence »

The military butt will draw blood on your shoulder with a standard weight barrel in .45-70 if placed too low. I've done it, and it's not fun. Just a reminder--that combo has significantly less recoil than the .45-110.

Like the others have said, if you plan to shoot enough to enjoy your rifle, get a shotgun butt, and unless you're absolutely tied to the Quigley model, you'll find that the pistol grip stock is considerably easier for most to consistently pull the rifle into your shoulder, which minimizes vertical stringing.

YMMV, but I suggest the #1 or Roughrider in .45-70 with a 30-32" heavy octagon or half-octagon as your first rifle, and you can always get it rechambered for a longer cartridge if you find the .45-70 inadequate (but I'll bet you won't find that). Even the .45-90 had noticably more recoil than some people like.

Clarence
johnl
Posts: 812
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:59 pm

Re: Deciding 45-70 vs 45-110

Post by johnl »

Buy one in each caliber, problem solved :lol: If you want one to imitate the movie get the 110. If you want a do all get the 45-70. Either way enjoy.
Post Reply