Venturino wasn't the first!

Talk with other Shiloh Sharps shooters.

Moderators: Kirk, Lucinda

Longknife76
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2019 4:15 pm

Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by Longknife76 »

Venturino wasn't the first to do long distance tests of the 45-70 Gov.!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/843705/posts
DeadEye
Posts: 1061
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:38 pm
Location: The Flatlands of Canada

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by DeadEye »

I don't remember Mike ever making that claim. Why take his name in vain?

Paul
"My heroes have always been cowboys and they still are it seems."
Glen Ring
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 3:45 pm

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by Glen Ring »

Good read. Mike is the best and I don't care who 's on first.
There are those that talk, and those that act. Make a choice.
Woody
Posts: 6064
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:02 am
Location: Freetown, Indiana

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by Woody »

I wish you hadn't taken Mike's name in vane, but still a good read. Since, I am one of few on this forum who love shooting the trapdoor, I enjoyed the read. I shoot a 525 grain Brooks "Turkey Killer". The best so far is a 91/100 at 600 yards, and a 100.4 at 200. Your results may vary.

Woody
Richard A. Wood
If you are surrounded. You are in a target rich environment.
Ted Tompkins
Posts: 323
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Big Arm, Montana

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by Ted Tompkins »

I have to agree. Mike is a fine man and that was in pretty poor taste.
Ted
Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for. Will Rogers 1879 -1935
beltfed
Posts: 1962
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:07 am
Location: Central Wi

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by beltfed »

Indeed, It is common knowledge FOR A LONG TIME about the Sandy Hook long range tests of the 45-70
Mike never tried to consider himself a first on long range BPCR shooting. In fact, I believe he even talked about
the Adobe Walls long shot of the late 1800s, too.
I do give him great credit for one of the people publicizing in his writings and his books, the Reviving of the BPCR shooting of the 1880s.

beltfed/arnie
semtav
Posts: 2899
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: Montana

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by semtav »

Good grief guys. Reread his post !!!
Now remember back to the article that was posted last week of mike, dennis and the owner of shiloh getting to go do long range test at the military grounds.
All he meant was they werent the first. Lightheartedly!!
Now quit pissing on his leg!!!
Glen Ring
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 3:45 pm

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by Glen Ring »

Yep...sometimes a little humor goes a long ways. I'm sure Mike didn't get his titey whiteys in a wad over this. We should not either. Good read, thanks for posting dude. I enjoyed it.
There are those that talk, and those that act. Make a choice.
Glen Ring
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 3:45 pm

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by Glen Ring »

Yep...sometimes a little humor goes a long ways. I'm sure Mike didn't get his titey whiteys in a wad over this. We should not either. Good read, thanks for posting dude. I enjoyed it.
There are those that talk, and those that act. Make a choice.
bobw
Posts: 3858
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:52 pm

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by bobw »

All these years croaking about your bpcr knowledge and you just discovered the Sandyhook trials? Jeebus you take the cake
bobw
Longknife76
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2019 4:15 pm

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by Longknife76 »

I really don't think I took anyone's name in vain!!!??? And I dont "croak", and I did read this article many, many years ago. Why has everyone got their panties in a knot??????
Longknife76
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2019 4:15 pm

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by Longknife76 »

BTW, "all these years of croaking" and I joined this forum 12/19 with total to date posts of 7!!!! You guys sure know how to throw out the "unwelcome" mat!!!!
GrumpyBear
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 6:42 pm
Location: Western,Pa

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by GrumpyBear »

Very easy to misunderstand the meanings of the written word, no need for anyone to take offence before explanations of intent are known. IMO.

And in this year everyone's hackles are a bit on edge anyway,understandably so. :D
Kenny Wasserburger
Posts: 4740
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2002 3:53 pm
Location: Gillette, Wyoming

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by Kenny Wasserburger »

Long knife, are you certain you are who Bobw’s Post was aimed at?


KW
We'll raise up our Glasses against Evil Forces, Singing, Whiskey for my men, Beer for my horses.

Wyoming Territory Sharps Shooter
beltfed
Posts: 1962
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:07 am
Location: Central Wi

Re: Venturino wasn't the first!

Post by beltfed »

Longknife 76,
"Venturino wasn't the first to do long distance tests of the 45-70 Gov.!!"

Its just that your "tone" of the comment, with the period and two exclamation points seemed
rather critical as if Mike was trying to take some credit for something original.
In this case Mike and company just
were talking about the Proving ground In Order to simply do a "remake" of what they
already know what had been done back then at Sandy Hook.

No different than what we were doing locally here in re-doing the famous "bucket" shot from the Quigley movie
as a bonus target in our gong matches. In our local case, at the matches formerly held at Abbotsford, the "bucket"
was a 1# powder can at 506yards. Lately, at my club we shoot at a bowling pin at 600yds for our bonus target.

No offence meant on my part, and Welcome to the fun of bantering back and forth,
as long as we all try to "be nice" and learn from and with each other. Please stick around. and do not have too
much of "thin skin" .
beltfed/arnie
Post Reply