Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
I’m working on an article on the BACO JIM410410M1 bullet (408.7gr using 16:1 alloy) in the Browning .40-65 BPCR with Swiss 1.5Fg & needed some velocity data vs. powder capacity. I thought I’d share the data. I did not shoot for accuracy, only over a chronograph to determine average velocities for each load. A chart with the data is below. BTW, it’s always been my rule-of-thumb not to compress Swiss 1.5Fg more than 0.1” for best accuracy, which is not confirmed or unproven by the chart. Since the chrono provided SD, I included it although it should not be taken as an indication of accuracy.
Another observation: if you do the math you’ll note that the changes in compression are about 0.026” per grain. This is due to the Browning chamber having a constant diameter neck resulting in each additional grain of powder being compressed the same amount. In chambers such as the Shiloh .40-65, the neck has a constant taper resulting in more compression required for each additional grain of powder assuming the bullet seating depth does not change.
Wayne
Another observation: if you do the math you’ll note that the changes in compression are about 0.026” per grain. This is due to the Browning chamber having a constant diameter neck resulting in each additional grain of powder being compressed the same amount. In chambers such as the Shiloh .40-65, the neck has a constant taper resulting in more compression required for each additional grain of powder assuming the bullet seating depth does not change.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
As I commented, the standard deviation numbers should not be taken as an indication of accuracy due to other factors affecting accuracy. Although, with that said, the two lower SD values in the chart do coincide with the best two accuracy loads for my rifle with the 410410M1 bullet.
Wayne
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 2789
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:36 pm
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
how many shots per load?
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
I would have rather shot 10/load but only had enough bullets to shoot 5/load. BTW, I wiped between shots.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 2789
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:36 pm
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
It's hard to say that the variation in SDs is meaningful with so few shots.
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:51 pm
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
WAYNE:
Don't forget that you have TWO variables here. Not only charge weight, but amount of compression. When the compression doesn't vary, e.g., in a muzzle loader, I see around 6-8 fps/grain of Swiss 1.5Fg, using moderate loads.
CHRIS
RGChristensen
Don't forget that you have TWO variables here. Not only charge weight, but amount of compression. When the compression doesn't vary, e.g., in a muzzle loader, I see around 6-8 fps/grain of Swiss 1.5Fg, using moderate loads.
CHRIS
RGChristensen
-
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:28 pm
- Location: Not Far enough NW in Illinois
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
I looked for that diminishing return some talked about a while back. I went up to .500" compression in my .50-2.5 and never found it, it slowed down the velocity but never to a point were it did not stop. I went with a .54 caliber muzzle loader up to 210 gr and it never went to zero but the loss of velocity was not as pronounced as a compressed load in the cartridge rifle with major compression.
I did not go higher because the recoil got to my upper limits
I did not go higher because the recoil got to my upper limits
The reason a dog has so many friends is because he wags his tail instead of his tongue.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery"Winston Churchill
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery"Winston Churchill
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
I agree. I probably should have left the SD data out of the chart but it does pretty well track my results from prior accuracy testing with at least 10 shots/load over various shooting conditions and also from many matches. 61grs seems to be the best accuracy load with 67grs being the 2nd best.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 7:38 pm
- Location: Hill Country, TX
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
Wayne,
Velocity is dependent on the energy in the powder, which imparts energy on the bullet. Given the same bullet and same expansion ration (same OAL), one would expect velocity to increase with the square root of powder ratio. I checked the top and bottom loads-taking the square root of 68/59 and multiplying it by the velocity of the 59 gr. load and got a number within a few fps of the 68 gr. load. So, within this range, the powder is transmitting the same percentage of its energy to the bullet.
Adding powder adds energy, but energy increases as the square of velocity, resulting in velocity increasing as the square root of the powder ratio.
I have found the Kidwell Money bullet in my Shiloh likes to be pushed hard, and so I kept increasing powder until I got the best accuracy at ~0.175" compression.
Clarence
Velocity is dependent on the energy in the powder, which imparts energy on the bullet. Given the same bullet and same expansion ration (same OAL), one would expect velocity to increase with the square root of powder ratio. I checked the top and bottom loads-taking the square root of 68/59 and multiplying it by the velocity of the 59 gr. load and got a number within a few fps of the 68 gr. load. So, within this range, the powder is transmitting the same percentage of its energy to the bullet.
Adding powder adds energy, but energy increases as the square of velocity, resulting in velocity increasing as the square root of the powder ratio.
I have found the Kidwell Money bullet in my Shiloh likes to be pushed hard, and so I kept increasing powder until I got the best accuracy at ~0.175" compression.
Clarence
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
Hi Clarence,
I don't have time to think about your comments as I'm heading to our deer lease for the last weekend of the extended season. I'll get back to this thread when I return & give your comments some thought. Thanks & have a good weekend.
Wayne
I don't have time to think about your comments as I'm heading to our deer lease for the last weekend of the extended season. I'll get back to this thread when I return & give your comments some thought. Thanks & have a good weekend.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:16 pm
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
I actually did basically the same thing as Clarence . The energy in the powder is a function of the mass. In theory the energy should vary linearly with respect to the weight of the charge, and not the velocity. There are plenty of reasons for the powder to impart it's energy to he bullet less than perfectly so I'm not surprised that the graph is not extremely close to being linear.
Chris.
Chris.
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Diminishing returns of powder vs. velocity
Clarence,
As I noted in my opening post, there are two, what I'm referring to here as "accuracy nodes", in my 16-twist Browning with the bullet and Swiss 1.5Fg. The higher 0.223" compression or accuracy node has repeatedly resulted in lower SD than the lower one at 0.067" of compression but the shot pattern opens a little worse at 500 meters with the higher compression. I've noted similar results with other bullets in the rifle including the Kidwell Money Bullet. But it just may be due to the heavier recoil or the point the bullet drops down to subsonic velocities. Regardless, since the lower velocity load has sufficient energy to reliably take down the rams, I see no advantage of going with the heavier load other than time-of-flight and a little flatter trajectory.
I may try the same experiment including accuracy testing with my Shiloh Sharps .40-65 with 14.5-twist bore using the Kidwell bullet which it seems to like.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com