Sorting brass by weight
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Sorting brass by weight
In another recent thread SSShooter (Glenn) posted, “Sorting by volume can be quite laborious. Weight-sorting is much faster/easier and likely good enough for most shooting, other than Schuetzen benchrest.”
Since I recently finished the process of preparing 199pcs of new Remington .45-70 brass for a Browning BPCR I thought I’d sort them by weight to see what the spread looks like. Without running a statistical analysis of the results it’s pretty obvious the mean is approximately 188.9grs with a spread of approximately +/- 1.1gr. I’m considering grouping & marking them by weight – probably 3 groups of 65pcs or so since a match typically requires 60 cases. Will it make a difference? We’ll see if/when I get around to running a good comparison. BTW, the 2 cases to the left weigh 187.3gr & 187.5gr
It would also be interesting to compare the weight spread vs. Starline and Winchester brass, but I don’t have any.
Wayne
Since I recently finished the process of preparing 199pcs of new Remington .45-70 brass for a Browning BPCR I thought I’d sort them by weight to see what the spread looks like. Without running a statistical analysis of the results it’s pretty obvious the mean is approximately 188.9grs with a spread of approximately +/- 1.1gr. I’m considering grouping & marking them by weight – probably 3 groups of 65pcs or so since a match typically requires 60 cases. Will it make a difference? We’ll see if/when I get around to running a good comparison. BTW, the 2 cases to the left weigh 187.3gr & 187.5gr
It would also be interesting to compare the weight spread vs. Starline and Winchester brass, but I don’t have any.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 9:48 am
- Location: Stillwater, OK
Re: Sorting brass by weight
Wayne, your cases look like when I weigh .22 lr ammo.
-
- Posts: 1962
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:07 am
- Location: Central Wi
Re: Sorting brass by weight
Wayne,
It would now be interesting if you were to take those weight sorted batch of cases and
re-sort by Volume, first marking the weights of the cases so as to keep track of weights vs volumes.
Would help to determine any relationship between the weight and the volume of the cases.
It also might be especially interesting to check the Volume of those two really lightest cases
vs the "main spread cases"
beltfed/arnie
It would now be interesting if you were to take those weight sorted batch of cases and
re-sort by Volume, first marking the weights of the cases so as to keep track of weights vs volumes.
Would help to determine any relationship between the weight and the volume of the cases.
It also might be especially interesting to check the Volume of those two really lightest cases
vs the "main spread cases"
beltfed/arnie
-
- Posts: 1580
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 2:37 pm
- Location: WA, dry side
- Contact:
Re: Sorting brass by weight
Check volume at each end and center. See how much difference.
-
- Posts: 2923
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:06 am
- Location: Jersey Shore
Re: Sorting brass by weight
I use a small triangular jeweler's file to put small notches on the rim of cases within a weight lot. After cleaning is easy to sort into loading trays or whatever simply by looking at the number of notches on the edge of the rim. Bit of a pita to notch, but only need to do so one time. As I sort by head-stamp after cleaning, is no additional work to sort by notch count at the same time.
Glenn
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Sorting brass by weight
Will do. I sure am not going to them all for volume.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Sorting brass by weight
Glenn,SSShooter wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 4:21 pm I use a small triangular jeweler's file to put small notches on the rim of cases within a weight lot. After cleaning is easy to sort into loading trays or whatever simply by looking at the number of notches on the edge of the rim. Bit of a pita to notch, but only need to do so one time. As I sort by head-stamp after cleaning, is no additional work to sort by notch count at the same time.
I use a Dremel tool with a thin diamond blade to quickly cut notches in the rim. All 200 were done in a few minutes.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 1078
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:32 pm
- Location: Stephens City, VA
Re: Sorting brass by weight
Wayne, I doubt if you'll see any advantage in separating these. It seems you've got a good batch of brass, extreme spread 2.2 grains. If they were mine I would mark the two odd ones for foulers and load and shoot the rest
"Perfection consists not so much in doing extraordinary things as in doing ordinary things extraordinarily well"
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Sorting brass by weight
Following are the results of measuring the water volume of one on each end and one in the middle. The 1st number is the case weight in grains the 2nd number is the water volume weight in grains. After primers were inserted a syringe was used to add the water and stopped with the reflection of the desk lamp on top of the water column formed a convex (rounded) surface with the last drop.
187.6 - 80.8
188.9 - 79.5
190.0 - 79.0
So there's absolutely no question in my mind that the case weight directly correlates to the case volume. Is it significant enough to make a difference?
We'll see.
Wayne
187.6 - 80.8
188.9 - 79.5
190.0 - 79.0
So there's absolutely no question in my mind that the case weight directly correlates to the case volume. Is it significant enough to make a difference?
We'll see.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 7:48 pm
- Location: Saint Cloud, MN
Re: Sorting brass by weight
I believe that cartridge brass is substantially heavier the BP. I do not remember the ratio, but if I have cases that weight within
3 grains of each other, I consider them to be the same weight.
They all shoot the same for me.
Keep on hav'n fun!
MikeT
3 grains of each other, I consider them to be the same weight.
They all shoot the same for me.
Keep on hav'n fun!
MikeT
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Sorting brass by weight
BTW, there's a typo in the case water volume measurements. The lightest case actually weighed 187.3gr. Therefore the corrected measurements are (case weight in grains - water weight in grains):
187.3 - 80.8
188.9 - 79.5
190.0 - 79.0
Wayne
187.3 - 80.8
188.9 - 79.5
190.0 - 79.0
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:25 am
- Location: australia
Re: Sorting brass by weight
first comment is, how do you know the external measurements of all cases is the same.
this is a hard one, and they must be to measure comparative capacity.
second thought is that 2 gn capacity will give a noticeable difference in compression in about a 70 gn case.
probably more so in a short fat case like 50 cal than 40 cal.
how much does this matter.?
if you size your brass, different metallurgy might induce different case dimensions, hence capacity.
a big question.
bruce.
this is a hard one, and they must be to measure comparative capacity.
second thought is that 2 gn capacity will give a noticeable difference in compression in about a 70 gn case.
probably more so in a short fat case like 50 cal than 40 cal.
how much does this matter.?
if you size your brass, different metallurgy might induce different case dimensions, hence capacity.
a big question.
bruce.
ventum est amicus meus
-
- Posts: 2172
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 7:38 pm
- Location: Hill Country, TX
Re: Sorting brass by weight
Bruce, the density of brass is in the area of 8.5 gm/cm3, as compared to 1 for water. I think your comment on external dimensions is pertinent; if identical, the internal volume differences could not be nearly as great as Wayne measured. It would be interesting to mark those 3 cases and re-check to water volume differences after they've been fired.
Wayne, what was the difference in lengths of those three cases? Any difference could also potentially skew the results.
Clarence
Wayne, what was the difference in lengths of those three cases? Any difference could also potentially skew the results.
Clarence
- august west
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2020 7:32 am
- Location: Ooltewah, TN
Re: Sorting brass by weight
But if you're putting an identical quantity of powder in each case, and compressing and wadding them the same, and seating nearly identical bullets, do micro variations in the length of the powder column matter?
"It ain't like it used to be but...it'll do." - Old Man Sykes
-
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:29 pm
- Location: Central Texas
- Contact:
Re: Sorting brass by weight
Guys,
When I said I was finished preparing new brass I should have said finished preparing and fireforming new brass. Since they were all fired once and only cleaned in a tumble with ceramic media the outside dimensions are the same. Generally fireformed brass length will vary by a few thousands. Knowing that any length differences will affect the measurement, I did double check the length of the three that were water volume measured. The lengths were identical to within 0.001". Sorry for not including the additional details in the initial posting.
Wayne
When I said I was finished preparing new brass I should have said finished preparing and fireforming new brass. Since they were all fired once and only cleaned in a tumble with ceramic media the outside dimensions are the same. Generally fireformed brass length will vary by a few thousands. Knowing that any length differences will affect the measurement, I did double check the length of the three that were water volume measured. The lengths were identical to within 0.001". Sorry for not including the additional details in the initial posting.
Wayne
NRA Life (Benefactor & President's Council) Member, TSRA Life Member, NSSF Member, Author & Publisher of the Browning BPCR book
http://www.texas-mac.com
http://www.texas-mac.com